A key aim of the State Government’s new workers compensation scheme is to contain the costs of the Compensating Authority.

The Government seeks to achieve this aim through several measures, including the enhancement of provisions directed towards return to work.

The current return to work obligation imposed on the employer under section 58B(1) is retained under the new scheme.

Additionally the new scheme enables an injured worker to formally seek suitable employment from their employer.

The Injured Worker’s Right to Seek Suitable Employment

Section 18(3) of the new scheme provides for the right to apply for new work which involves the following:

  • The injured worker providing written notice of their request to return to work;
  • The confirmation by the injured worker that they are ready, willing and able to return to work with the employer; and
  • The provision by the injured worker of information about the type of employment that they are capable of performing.

An employer may respond to a written request from an injured worker that they are able to return to work.

Return to Work Remedy

An injured worker is also provided with a simple and direct remedy for their return to work.

A failure by the employer to respond, within a reasonable time, to a formal request for a return to work enables the injured worker to apply to the Tribunal for an order that the employer provide them with suitable employment (section 18(3) of the RTW Act).

The Tribunal will have the power to make an order subject to a reasonable test that the employer provide the injured worker with employment.

Time Limit for Seeking Return to Work Remedy

No time limit has been set as to when an injured worker must make an application to the Tribunal seeking an order that their employer provide them with employment.

The Tribunal’s power is simply enlivened when the employer fails, within a reasonable time, to provide suitable employment to the injured worker.

The Tribunal may order that the employer provide employment, including after the first 104 week period when the right to compensation payments may have ceased.

Costs

Significantly, the Tribunal may also order that the employer pay the injured worker’s costs of the dispute regarding the provision of employment.

In the absence of such an order the Compensating Authority is liable for the costs of both the worker and the employer.

Implication for Employers

An employer of an injured worker will need to be in a position to appropriately respond to a request to return to work with the employer.

The policies and practices of an employer may need to be reviewed to ensure compliance with the enhanced return to work provisions of the new scheme.

In practice, the enhanced return to work provisions can be expected to operate as a cost shifting exercise from the Compensating Authority to employers.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

Ben Duggan

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
October 08, 2024 When Restraint Clauses Protect Confidentiality
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
October 08, 2024 Restraint Clauses in Australia: Changes on the Horizon
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
October 08, 2024 New Modern Award Rights for Workplace Delegates: What Employers Need to Know
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
August 27, 2024 Podcast - Industrial Manslaughter
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
June 19, 2024 “Combination” Clarity on Causation or Query on “Consequential”
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
June 19, 2024 Do Not Disturb: What Employers Need to Know About the Fair Work ‘Right to Disconnect’
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
June 04, 2024 Fair Work Commission Annual Wage Review: Minimum Wage Increase Less Than Expected
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
April 18, 2024 2025 Edition of Best Lawyers: Celebrating Our Leaders and a Rising Star
Firm News Corporate & Commercial Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety + 6
April 02, 2024 Introducing DW Fox Tucker Lawyers Newest Director
Firm News Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
December 20, 2023 Workplace Criminalisation: Labor Governments Criminalise Workplace Manslaughter and Wage Theft
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
December 20, 2023 Seriously Injured Workers and the Obligation of Mutuality
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
December 05, 2023 It’s Time to Fix Your Fixed-Term Contracts!
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
November 28, 2023 Payroll Tax and Medical Practices: An Update and Warning to Others
Tax Health & Aged Care Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
October 19, 2023 Bridging the Gap: New Director Enhances Workers Compensation Practice
Firm News Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
September 27, 2023 Workers Compensation in South Australia: Has Malinauskas Kicked an Own Goal?
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
September 15, 2023 Payroll Tax and Medical Practices
Tax Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Health & Aged Care
September 11, 2023 Taking Reasonable Care to Ensure Your Acts or Omissions Don’t Land You in Court
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
September 06, 2023 Hospitality and Retail Brace for Impact
Hospitality Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
August 02, 2023 Increase in Minimum Award Rates of Pay
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
July 17, 2023 Section 18: A Solution Looking for a Problem
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance