Today, precisely three months from the release of the original Exposure Draft the Government has introduced a Bill to effect the small business rollover announced in the 2015 budget. After much lobbying by professional bodies the Bill is an improvement on the Exposure Draft.

The Bill still allows CGT assets or an entire business to be moved to another entity without CGT or income tax on the transfers of trading stock, depreciating assets or other revenue assets. It also widens the range of businesses that may access the concession. In the Exposure Draft small business entities were eligible only if they also met the $6 million ‘maximum net assets test’; the Bill introduced today no longer contains the assets test requirement. Any small business entity may use the new rollover, subject to meeting the required criteria. A small business entity is one which has, together with its connected entities and affiliates, a turnover under $2 million.

Widening the range of potentially eligible entities will benefit Australian business. A business can be transferred to a more appropriate or more economic structure as it grows, scales down or changes its mode of operation. Poor structuring decisions can be remedied and asset protection enhanced by ensuring passive assets are not held in a structure that carries business risk. In our Tax Alert of 12 November 2015 we discussed advantages for a business using this rollover.

The rollover may be used by any small business entity; company, trustee, partnership or individual[1] to roll assets or a business to any other small business entity provided certain criteria are met. The asset being rolled over must be an asset used in a business that is carried on by the owner of that asset or one of its associates[2] and the ultimate economic ownership of the asset or assets involved must not change materially.  There is also a requirement that the rollover be in relation to a transaction that is a genuine business restructure.

While clearly what constitutes a ‘genuine’ business restructure is a question of fact the legislation also contains a safe harbour. This provides that the transaction will automatically be considered a genuine business restructure if for three years after the transaction there is no change in the ultimate economic owners of the assets transferred (apart from any trading stock) and the assets all continue to be used in a business with no, or only insignificant, private use.

Even if the transaction does not come within the safe harbour, for example because some of the plant used in the business is replaced with new technology, it may still be a ‘genuine’ business restructure. The Bill is very clear that the safe harbour is there to give certainty and simplicity not to limit the factual nature of what is or is not a genuine business restructure.

Special provision is made for discretionary trusts as generally no individual has any ultimate economic ownership of any asset held by the trustee of a discretionary trust. The trustee of a discretionary trust must make a Family Trust Election and all the members of the family group covered by that election will be considered ultimate economic owners of the assets held by the trustee.

The potential benefits of the restructures allowed by the new rollover are greatly enhanced for South Australian businesses by the abolition of stamp duty on business assets other than real property from 1 July 2015, the 1/3 reduction in duty on transfers of commercial property from 7 December 2015 and the promised reduction and finally abolition of duty on transfers of commercial property from 1 July 2017 and 1 July 2018 respectively.

The new law is expected to apply from 1 July 2016. For more information on the possibilities the roll-over could open up for your business please contact Julie Van der Velde or any member of the DW Fox Tucker tax team.

  1. Tax exempt bodies and superannuation funds are specifically excluded.

  2. An ‘active asset’.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

John Tucker

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
October 08, 2024 Re-Raising of Historical Tax Debts
Tax
June 19, 2024 Schools and Payroll Tax: Assessing the Possibility for an Exemption
Tax
May 21, 2024 Preparing for Payroll Tax Changes in Medical Practices: Clarity Still Required
Tax
December 20, 2023 Discretionary Trust Deed Issues
Tax
November 28, 2023 Payroll Tax and Medical Practices: An Update and Warning to Others
Tax Health & Aged Care Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
September 15, 2023 Payroll Tax and Medical Practices
Tax Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Health & Aged Care
December 16, 2020 No Thanks! Effective Disclaimer of a Trust Entitlement
Tax
December 16, 2020 Onus of Proof in Tax Disputes
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Tax
May 22, 2020 RevenueSA Online Land Tax Portal – Responding to Land Tax Letters
Tax
April 10, 2020 Residence Issues for Trust Estates With Foreign Corporate Trustees
Tax
April 10, 2020 Land Tax Reform – What Does it All Mean?
Tax
April 10, 2020 On the Hook: Directors in the Tax Firing Line
Tax
April 06, 2020 COVID-19: Payroll Tax and Land Tax Measures
Tax
September 16, 2019 Draft Land Tax (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill 2019
Tax
August 23, 2019 Land Tax Reform for Trusts
Tax
August 13, 2019 Aggregation of Land Held on Trust for Land Tax Purposes
Tax
June 21, 2019 Offloading Tax Liabilities Between Spouses
Tax Family Law
June 21, 2019 Succession Planning
Tax Wills & Estate Planning
November 07, 2018 ATO Raids
Tax
November 07, 2018 Trust Splitting
Tax