In the 2016 Federal Budget the Treasurer stated that the Government would introduce amendments to the Wine Equalisation Tax (WET) legislation that would have effect from 1 July 2019. These amendments would, amongst other things, ‘tighten’ (ie, restrict) the rules regarding the eligibility of wine producers to access the WET rebate. Between then and early this calendar year, Treasury called for responses and undertook consultation as to the extent and form of these amendments. Various industry bodies, wine producers and others (including ourselves at DW Fox Tucker Lawyers) provided comments.

Following that consultation, in April of this year Treasury published exposure legislation giving effect to Treasury’s proposed reforms and on the final sitting day before winter Parliamentary recess (ie 22 June 2017) final legislation was introduced and read for a second time in the House of Representatives. The key changes with application date to assessable dealings from 1 July 2018 were as follows:

  • The WET producer rebate cap for each producer (or group of associated producers) will be reduced from $500,000 to $350,000 per annum;
  • The test for whether two producers are “associated producers” will be tightened by extending the timing of the test from the end of the financial year to at any time during the financial year;
  • the WET producer rebate will be limited to wine for which:
    • producers maintain ownership of the wine’s source product throughout the wine-making process;
    • 85% of the final product originated from source product that was owned by the producer;
    • producers have packaged the product in a container that does not exceed five litres (or 51 litres for cider and perry); and
    • producers have branded the final product with a registered trade mark owned by that producer (or a common law trade mark if the mark does not qualify for registration); and
  • grape wine product containing between 700 millilitres and less than 850 millilitres of grape wine per litre will now be subject to excise and excise equivalent customs duty rather than the WET.

We do not provide detailed commentary on these changes.

Instead, in response to a number of similar questions being asked by our clients, we thought to highlight the rules regarding the application and transition of the existing rules to the new rules.

For example:

  1. What of unsold wine stock already on hand that has been produced prior to the publication of these provisions, or wine produced between now and the end of 30 June 2018?
  2. If rebatable under the existing rules, will that wine continue to be rebatable?
  3. Further, will that (what we shall refer to as “Old Rebatable Wine”) continue to be rebatable after 1 July 2018, even if under the new rules it would not be?

For example, in a practical context can vintage 2016 or 2017 wine be sold after 1 July 2018 and still get the benefit of the WET rebate if:

  • It is sold as bulk wine, or does it require trade mark labelling and to be sold up to a maximum of 5 litre containers? Or
  • Subject to the earlier producer rebate provisions (that are also to be repealed), if less than 85% of the wine was produced from source product owned by the producer before the wine making process?

In order to answer these questions it is necessary to consider the transitional provisions, noting that when any taxation law is amended, particularly one which is a tightening or a narrowing of existing rules that have application on a future date, separate provisions are introduced to deal with the change so as to potentially soften the immediacy of any detrimental impact.

Whilst the position under the exposure draft legislation and its accompanying explanatory memorandum was, in our opinion, confused, the final Bill as tabled before Parliament provides further clarification.

The application and transitional provisions note that the amendments to WET rebate eligibility apply to assessable dealings in wine from the FY2019 financial year (ie from 1 July 2018). They go on to provide that the amendments also apply to assessable dealings in circumstances where the crushing of the source product for more than 50% of the wine occurred on or after 1 July 2018 (thereby presumably picking up wine produced from the 2018 vintage).

Under the exposure draft this raised for us the question as to whether either:

  • the new WET rebate eligibility rules:
    • apply to all assessable dealings from 1 July 2018, irrespective of the year of vintage of that wine; and
    • also apply to assessable dealings in relation to 2018 vintage wine, even if those assessable dealings are before 1 July 2018.

Diagrammatically:

1

(Interpretation A)

OR

  • the:
    • new WET rebate eligibility rules apply to assessable dealings from 1 July 2018 bringing into those rules wine produced from the 2018 vintage; and
    • current existing WET rebate eligibility rules will continue to apply to assessable dealings for all existing wine stock on hand and wine produced this 2017 vintage (unless that wine is blended with more than 50% 2018 vintage wine) even if that dealing is after 1 July 2018.

Diagrammatically:

2

(Interpretation B)

It was not clear as to which of these two interpretations Treasury intended in drafting the exposure draft provisions. On a literal reading of the draft application provisions, we believed that, on balance, Interpretation A is the most accurate.

However it would have been inequitable in our opinion for there to be no grandfathering of existing product in tank and of wine from the current 2017 vintage to enable its eligibility. Otherwise, there would arguably be an unfair level of retrospective taxation.

The final bill as tabled before Parliament to some extent expands the transitional application of the provisions and provides further specifics, noting that it appears a hybrid of the above interpretations. That is, broadly speaking – with respect to 2017 year and earlier year vintage wine (excluding fortified wine), the 85% ownership of source product requirement does not apply to wine:

  • if the crushing of the source product for more than 50% of the wine occurred before 1 January 2018; and
  • the producer of the wine owned it immediately before 1 January 2018; and
  • it meets the following requirements:
    • an assessable dealing with the wine (in most cases a sale) occurs on or before 30 June 2023; and
    • was bottled on or before 30 June 2018, or correctly labelled with a vintage date of the wine as being for the 2017 year or an earlier year.

However, notably the earlier producer rebate rule continues to apply to wine to which this transitional rule applies.

So… what does this mean…? Does it mean that the new WET eligibility rules don’t apply at all to 2017 year and earlier year vintage wine existing product in tank if more than 50% of the wine was crushed before 1 January 2018? No, for there is no complete grandfathering of that wine stock. That is, for 2017 year and earlier year vintage wine the bottling and trade mark requirement remains.

Diagrammatically, therefore the new WET rules apply in broad terms as follows:

Capture

Consequently, wine producers that have existing wine stock on hand that is unlikely to meet the bottling and trade marking requirements under the new rules, knowing that it will not otherwise be grandfathered post 1 July 2018 might best consider whether they are able realise their stock before then.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

John Tucker

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
October 08, 2024 Re-Raising of Historical Tax Debts
Tax
June 19, 2024 Schools and Payroll Tax: Assessing the Possibility for an Exemption
Tax
May 21, 2024 Preparing for Payroll Tax Changes in Medical Practices: Clarity Still Required
Tax
December 20, 2023 Discretionary Trust Deed Issues
Tax
November 28, 2023 Payroll Tax and Medical Practices: An Update and Warning to Others
Tax Health & Aged Care Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
September 15, 2023 Payroll Tax and Medical Practices
Tax Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Health & Aged Care
March 25, 2022 SA Labor to Apply Criminal Law to Workplaces Under its Industrial Relations Policy
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Agribusiness Defence + 7
December 16, 2020 No Thanks! Effective Disclaimer of a Trust Entitlement
Tax
December 16, 2020 Onus of Proof in Tax Disputes
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Tax
May 22, 2020 RevenueSA Online Land Tax Portal – Responding to Land Tax Letters
Tax
April 10, 2020 Residence Issues for Trust Estates With Foreign Corporate Trustees
Tax
April 10, 2020 Land Tax Reform – What Does it All Mean?
Tax
April 10, 2020 On the Hook: Directors in the Tax Firing Line
Tax
April 06, 2020 COVID-19: Payroll Tax and Land Tax Measures
Tax
September 16, 2019 Draft Land Tax (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill 2019
Tax
August 23, 2019 Land Tax Reform for Trusts
Tax
August 13, 2019 Aggregation of Land Held on Trust for Land Tax Purposes
Tax
June 21, 2019 Offloading Tax Liabilities Between Spouses
Tax Family Law
June 21, 2019 Succession Planning
Tax Wills & Estate Planning
November 07, 2018 ATO Raids
Tax