Termination of Resident’s Contract

A resident of a retirement village unit governed under the Retirement Villages Act 2016 (SA) (Act) will sign a Resident’s Contract (“Contract”), which normally provides for an occupation license for the unit to be granted to the resident in consideration of the resident making of a loan to the Operator. The loan is usually payable soon after the signing of the Contract.

A Contract will usually provide for the termination of resident’s rights by the Operator in case of a breach of the contract or a certain period of notice being given. Often this period of notice is 14 days or thereabouts. In the case of a breach of the Contract by the resident, the Contract usually allows the Operator to terminate the Contract on the basis of the resident having committed a breach of the Contract or the rules. Sometimes this breach arises because the resident has been unable to pay the loan amount required to be paid under the Contract. Typically this will happen where the resident has been unable to sell a house which needs to be sold in order to pay the loan amount.

The termination of a Contract and, arising from this, the requirement for the resident to vacate the unit, will potentially be distressing for the resident. The question is, what rights does the resident have in these circumstances?

Section 44 of the Act provides that a resident in a retirement village has a right of occupation that cannot be terminated unless the resident commits a breach of the Contract or the rules and the Operator terminates the resident’s right of occupation on that ground. A Contract also might be terminated where the resident acts in a manner that adversely affects the health and safety of persons working in the retirement village or that seriously disturbs the peace or comfort of other residents of the retirement village.

A failure to pay the loan amount when due would ordinarily be a breach of the Contract.

However Section 44(8) of the Act provides that the Operator’s decision to terminate a resident’s right of occupation is ineffective unless the Tribunal (being the South Australian Civil & Administrative Tribunal), on the application of the Operator, is satisfied on proper grounds, which are sufficiently serious to justify termination of the right of occupation, exist and confirms the Operator’s decision.

If the Tribunal confirms the Operator’s decision then it must fix a period of time within which the resident must vacate the residence.

Under Section 44(12) if the Operator decides to terminate a resident’s right of occupation the Operator must give the resident notice:

  1. Setting out the grounds of the decision;
  2. Providing the resident with a copy of the Operator’s dispute resolution policy;
  3. Informing the resident that the decision is subject to review by the Tribunal; and
  4. Informing the resident of his or her rights with regard to such a review.

A failure to follow this procedure may result in a prosecution with a maximum penalty of $10,000.

Section 45 of the Act requires an Operator to have a dispute resolution policy and it must be provided on request to the resident.

Section 46 of the Act provides that a party to a dispute between an Operator and a resident may apply to the Tribunal for a resolution. However an application should not be made to the Tribunal unless the parties have made reasonable attempts to resolve the dispute. This means that where there is the delay in paying a loan amount it is necessary and reasonable for the Operator and the resident to try and resolve the dispute regarding the payment. A resolution of the dispute may involve the payment of interest. At a hearing the Tribunal may make such orders as it thinks appropriate including an order for the payment of the amount under the Contract or the payment of compensation for loss or injury. Alternatively the Tribunal may confirm the Operator’s decision to terminate a right of occupation.

The various provisions of the Act make it clear that a retirement village Operator cannot just terminate a right of occupation where there is a delay or a breach in the payment of a loan amount on the due date. There is a process to be undertaken before the Operator can lawfully terminate a right of occupation of a retirement village unit.

DW Fox Tucker Lawyers are able to advise on resident rights and Operator rights under the Act.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

William Esau

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
June 19, 2024 Distraint for Rent – What Landlords Need to Know
Property
April 18, 2024 2025 Edition of Best Lawyers: Celebrating Our Leaders and a Rising Star
Firm News Corporate & Commercial Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety + 6
December 20, 2023 Residential Tenancies Act Amendments Navigating the Impact on Landlords
Property
November 28, 2023 Payroll Tax and Medical Practices: An Update and Warning to Others
Tax Health & Aged Care Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
September 15, 2023 Payroll Tax and Medical Practices
Tax Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Health & Aged Care
September 11, 2023 Advertising Health Services
Corporate & Commercial Health & Aged Care
August 28, 2023 Guidelines: Telehealth Consultations With Patients
Insurance & Risk Management Health & Aged Care
May 11, 2022 Health Sector: Preparing for the End of State-Imposed COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Health & Aged Care
March 25, 2022 SA Labor to Apply Criminal Law to Workplaces Under its Industrial Relations Policy
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Agribusiness Defence + 7
March 04, 2022 Why We Should Avoid the Use of the Word “Mandate” When Communicating Vaccination Requirements to Workers and the Wider Community
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Health & Aged Care Agribusiness + 3
January 14, 2022 Learning to Live With COVID-19 - The Trolley Dilemma in Our Economy
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Workers Compensation & Self Insurance Agribusiness + 3
December 09, 2021 Aged Care: Staying Ahead of the Curve
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Health & Aged Care
December 16, 2020 Building and Construction Contracts: The Importance of Good Contract Administration
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Property
September 30, 2020 COVID-19: Retail and Commercial Leasing Emergency Relief Prescribed Period 2
Property
September 09, 2020 COVID-19: Retail and Commercial Leasing Emergency Relief Extension
Property
May 18, 2020 COVID-19 Regulations for Commercial Tenancies
Property
May 13, 2020 State Government Announces Changes Affecting Commercial Tenancies
Property
April 17, 2020 COVID-19: Mandatory Code for Commercial Tenancies
Property
March 30, 2020 Coronavirus: Commercial Landlords and Tenants
Property
November 14, 2018 Dealing with Self-Represented Litigants in the South Australian Employment Tribunal
Health & Aged Care Workers Compensation & Self Insurance