The Commonwealth Government (the Government) has announced temporary changes to the foreign investment regime to protect Australia’s national interest during the COVID-19 pandemic - a historically challenging time for the economy, businesses and the broader community.

The changes will apply to all new foreign investment applications which fall within the scope of the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (the Act).

Foreign investment in Australia

Australia has the 14th highest amount of direct foreign inward investment in the world, having a total of $3.5 trillion invested by foreign economies in Australia at the end of 2018.

A ‘foreign person’ is defined under the Act as:

  • an individual that is not ordinarily resident in Australia;
  • a foreign government or foreign government investor;
  • a corporation, trustee of a trust or general partner of a limited partnership where an individual not ordinarily resident in Australia, foreign corporation or foreign government holds substantial interest of at least 20 per cent; or
  • a corporation, trustee of a trust or general partner of a limited partnership in which two or more foreign persons hold an aggregate substantial interest of at least 40 per cent.

It is not uncommon for transactions in relation to the sale of South Australian businesses to involve foreign persons as a potential purchaser. As such, Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) approval is often a mandatory element in transactions that we come across, particularly in the agricultural, defence, mining and manufacturing industries. In fact, recently, we were involved in two transactions acting for a Vendor and Purchaser respectively, that both required FIRB approval.

The first transaction was the sale of shares in a defence business to an Australian private equity fund owned in part by foreign government interests. FIRB approval was contemplated in the Share Sale and Purchase Agreement as a Condition Precedent.

The second transaction was the acquisition of agricultural land (a large farm on the Eyre Peninsula) by an agricultural investment trust, owned by a listed company group which in turn was partly owned by foreign interests. In the Land Sale Agreement, Settlement was conditional upon the receipt of FIRB approval. 

Key FIRB amendments

Through consultation with and endorsement by FIRB, the Government announced a series of temporary changes to the Australian foreign investment review framework to protect Australian businesses and assets from predatory foreign takeovers.

The Treasurer, Josh Frydenberg was emphatic in dismissing any suggestions that the new temporary measures are intended to discourage foreign investment in Australia, noting that foreign investment remains vital to Australia’s long-term economic success and stability. However, the temporary measures will lead to greater scrutiny and significantly increase the number of first-time applicants to FIRB.

Period of temporary measures

These temporary measures took effect from 10:30pm AEDT on Sunday, 29 March 2020 and they will remain in place for the duration of the current crisis.

Zero monetary screening thresholds for all foreign investments

The monetary screening thresholds previously prescribed by the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Regulation 2015 (the Regulation) have now been reduced to $0. This means all new foreign investment applications that are subject to the Act will require FIRB approval irrespective of the value, nature of investment or origin of the foreign investor. Therefore, FIRB approval is required for all investments in or acquisitions of an Australian company or business (including assets) made by a foreign person as defined in the Act.

Prior to this change, the thresholds ranged from $0 - $1,192 million. The previous thresholds remain applicable to transactions that were entered into via contract prior to 29 March 2020 but have not yet completed (i.e. settled). Transactions entered into prior to 29 March 2020 involving foreign persons will not require FIRB approval under the recent zero monetary threshold amendments.

By way of background, prior to the new temporary amendments, the precise monetary thresholds were dependent on various factors, such as:

  • the type of foreign investor (privately owned or foreign government investors);
  • the nature of the asset being acquired or invested into (non-sensitive businesses, sensitive businesses including media, telecommunications or defence business, land both for development or agricultural purposes, or agribusiness); and
  • the origin of the investor (whether the country of origin is a country with which Australia has a free trade agreement).

As a general summary - without factoring in the variables referred to above - if a Foreign investor was looking to acquire:

  • agricultural land – the previous threshold would have been $15 million;
  • shares in an Australian Company – the previous threshold would have been $275 million; or
  • assets in an Australia Business – the prior threshold would have been $275 million.

Beyond these monetary thresholds, FIRB approval was required. For more detailed information regarding the FIRB monetary thresholds that were previously in place before the new temporary FIRB amendments came into effect, please refer to FIRB’s website[1].

Exemptions

Exemptions under the Act and Regulation remain in place. If you would like to learn more about exemptions under the Act or determine if your proposed transaction is exempt, please refer to FIRB’s website[2].

Extension of application review timeframes

Prior to the changes to application review timeframes, the statutory timeframe the Treasurer had to consider an application and make a decision was 30 days. The Treasurer could extend this period by up to a further 90 days by publishing an interim order or by requesting that investors provide their consent to extend the period voluntarily.

FIRB will now be seeking to extend the application review timeframe from 30 days to up to six months. All new and most existing applications received by FIRB as at 29 March 2020 can expect this extended timeframe to be applied. However, there will not necessarily be an extension in all cases. In instances where an extension is requested, this does not mean FIRB will take the full six month period to process an application.

The extended timeframe will allow FIRB to account for an expected influx of foreign investment applications. In addition, given FIRB deals with each application on a case-by-case basis, it must liaise with relevant government departments on each application, including the ATO, Treasury and any relevant State Departments, before making a recommendation to the Treasurer or Minister assisting the Treasurer. As such, all dealings involving foreign investors should contemplate, expect and consider material delays of up to six months for FIRB approval to be granted.

Where there are any anticipated economic or commercial impacts associated with the extended timeframe, it is important that this is brought to the attention of FIRB. Priority will be given to urgent applications that either directly protect and support Australian businesses and jobs or have commercial deadlines relating to the proposed investment.

Take note

If a transaction requires FIRB approval and FIRB approval is not obtained, it will constitute a breach of the FIRB legislative regime and consequences could include:

  • the preventing or unwinding of the entire transaction;
  • criminal prosecution;
  • civil penalty orders; or
  • a forced divestiture of assets.

Therefore during the COVID-19 pandemic - as was the case prior to these new temporary amendments - if FIRB approval is required, either a Condition Precedent needs to be inserted into the contract requiring the need for FIRB approval, or alternatively the contract should not be executed by and become binding on the parties until the formal FIRB approval has been obtained.

To conclude

As a result of these changes, all foreign investors and associated parties should lodge their applications with FIRB as early as possible to allow for significant delays, and ensure these expected delays are factored into their decision making processes.

If you need further assistance understanding the consequences of these changes on your business dealings or determining if your transaction will be exempt, please contact one of our M&A experts.

  1. https://firb.gov.au/guidance-resources/guidance-notes/gn34#_ftn3

  2. https://firb.gov.au/exemptions-thresholds/exemptions

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

Sandy Donaldson

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
November 04, 2024 DW Fox Tucker Lawyers welcomes Dr Mark Giancaspro to boost the firm’s commercial team and add a new sports law offering
Firm News Corporate & Commercial Sports Law
October 29, 2024 Disqualifications and Jail Time: ASIC Increasing Pressure on Directors for Mismanagement
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
June 19, 2024 When Are Goods or Services Acquired by a “Consumer”? When Do Guarantees Under the Australian Consumer Law Apply? Can Suppliers and Manufacturers Liability Be Limited?
Corporate & Commercial
April 18, 2024 2025 Edition of Best Lawyers: Celebrating Our Leaders and a Rising Star
Firm News Corporate & Commercial Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety + 6
December 20, 2023 New Reasons to Keep Your Contract Terms Fair
Corporate & Commercial
December 20, 2023 Deeds vs Agreements
Corporate & Commercial
December 20, 2023 When Can You Send Unsolicited Electronic Messages?
Corporate & Commercial
September 11, 2023 Advertising Health Services
Corporate & Commercial Health & Aged Care
October 14, 2022 Lessons From Theranos
Corporate & Commercial
October 12, 2022 Vendor Safety Nets
Corporate & Commercial
October 06, 2022 Bind Games
Corporate & Commercial
May 02, 2022 Privacy Week - Top Tips
Corporate & Commercial Intellectual Property (IP)
March 30, 2022 Domain Names and Cyber Security
Corporate & Commercial Intellectual Property (IP)
March 29, 2022 Are You a Director Who Still Needs to Get Your Director ID?
Corporate & Commercial
September 20, 2021 Termination of the Naval Group’s Australian Contract: What It Means for Local Subcontractors
Corporate & Commercial Defence
June 30, 2021 When are Directors Liable for Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Passing off, Trade Mark Infringement or Unconscionable Conduct?
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Intellectual Property (IP)
January 20, 2021 Terms and Conditions for Sale of Goods/Incoterms® 2020 and Vienna Convention
Corporate & Commercial
December 16, 2020 King Reigns All: High Court Decides Holding Companies May Be Held Accountable for Subsidiary Company Actions
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
December 16, 2020 Building and Construction Contracts: The Importance of Good Contract Administration
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Property
June 09, 2020 COVID-19: Companies Given the Temporary Right to E-Sign Agreements
Corporate & Commercial