On 1 September 2021, significant changes to Family Law were implemented. These changes required separating couples to undertake “genuine steps” to resolve their issues before issuing court proceedings.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is one of the accepted “steps” for resolving parenting issues or financial matters. Arbitration is one ADR option, in particular, that is becoming increasingly popular for its ability to deliver simplicity and timely resolutions to an often stressful and emotionally draining process.

Arbitration

Arbitration provides an alternate path for married and de-facto couples seeking to avoid court. It can be utilized either before or after court proceedings, but only for resolving financial matters. It is not applicable to parenting matters or child support.

Although not a novel concept in family law, its employment is less widespread compared to other legal areas, such as commercial law. To address this, the Family Court of Australia and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia have set up a specialised National Arbitration List and are actively promoting Court Ordered Arbitration. This move aims to ease the pressure on the Court system and fulfil Court’s purpose to resolve disputes fairly, legally, and in a quick, cost-effective, and efficient manner.

Compared to a trial, arbitration is a straightforward, low-cost and fast process that has the benefit of achieving the same result, namely, a court order that can be enforced by law.

One of the attractions of arbitration is that it can be used to determine a single issue or a range of issues, whether on a final or temporary basis. For example:

  • a property division between a separated couple;
  • whether spousal maintenance should be paid to one party and how much; or
  • to determine disputes about the value of property and assets and superannuation splitting.

At the start of the process, an arbitrator is appointed or chosen by the parties. This person is usually a retired family law judge or experienced family lawyer trained as an arbitrator.

Depending on the extent of the dispute, the arbitration can proceed without needing a hearing or either party giving evidence. The arbitrator will review the available documentation, which should include agreed facts, and make a decision “on the papers”. This option is best suited to matters where most things are agreed (valuations of property and assets), but someone needs to decide who pays and what the amount will be. This is a far cheaper option because of the significant amount of time saved on preparation and negotiation.

Arbitration can also occur “on the papers” with the addition of oral submissions. This means that the lawyer for each party will present a proposal for finalising the matter. The arbitrator will consider the proposals and other documentation and determine how to resolve the dispute.

Lastly, if required, there can be a full hearing where parties are cross-examined, and submissions are made at the end of the evidence. While this is similar to a trial, you don’t have to worry about the long delays associated with going to court. This means a decision can be made far quicker, and both parties can begin to move on with their lives.

If you’re already involved in the court process, you can agree with your former partner to have an arbitration rather than a trial. The court will make an order for the arbitration to ensure the arbitration is easily accessible, cost-effective and time efficient.

All arbitrations require the parties to disclose all financial documents, and with a court-ordered arbitration, a financial statement has to be provided by each party.

If your dispute is time sensitive and you wish to explore a cheaper and more timely process, arbitration could be an option.

If you would like to discuss to have a free no obligation chat to discuss this process and if it is right for you, please get in touch with Joanne, our family law expert.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

Joanne Cliff

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
October 08, 2024 Family Law Act Amendments Concerning Parenting Matters
Family Law
June 19, 2024 Spousal Maintenance
Family Law
December 20, 2023 Parenting Matters Now Firmly Focused on Child’s Best Interests
Family Law
September 29, 2023 Proposed Amendments Incorporating Domestic Violence Factors into Financial Settlements in Family Law Matters
Family Law
March 15, 2023 Navigating Separation: A 5-Step Guide to Successful Mediation in Family Law
Family Law
February 24, 2023 Family Courts Look to Arbitration to Streamline Resolutions
Family Law
August 19, 2022 4 Things to Know About Separation/Divorce and Wills
Family Law
July 21, 2022 11 Practical Ways to Save Money on Family Law Matters
Family Law
April 21, 2022 How to Avoid Court - Five Alternative Ways to Resolve Parenting and Financial Matters
Family Law
December 23, 2021 New Era in Family Law
Family Law
October 08, 2021 10 Ways to Kick Start Your Separation
Family Law
December 16, 2020 Family Law Court Initiatives
Family Law
April 10, 2020 The Long Reach of Spousal Maintenance
Family Law
April 06, 2020 COVID-19: Family Law and the Courts
Family Law
September 25, 2019 Separated but Living Under the One Roof: Together but Apart
Family Law
June 21, 2019 Offloading Tax Liabilities Between Spouses
Tax Family Law
November 29, 2018 Consent Orders
Family Law
March 26, 2018 Binding Financial Agreements Following the High Court Decision of Thorne V Kennedy
Family Law
October 31, 2017 Broadening the CGT Relief for Separating Couples
Family Law Tax
July 11, 2017 Collaborative Law
Family Law