iExtend launched in 2021 and was designed to offer an alternative life insurance solution for consumers considering cancelling their policy.  While a range of processes and conditions were attached to iExtend’s service, in summary, it offered to co-own life insurance policies with consumers who intended to cancel their life insurance policy. Under the arrangement, iExtend would jointly own the life insurance policy, cover ongoing premiums for its share of the policy, and then take a portion of the insurance payout with the chosen beneficiaries or policy owner's estate.

iExtend offered this service via financial advisers to clients who were committed to cancelling their cover. When describing the services offered by iExtend, its CEO, David Sarkis, stated that “iExtend wants to fill a gap in the insurance market and to partner with financial advisers and insurance providers to ensure policyholders can continue the valued relationship they have with them by accessing a flexible, innovative and alternative insurance option.”

On 17 June 2022, ASIC commenced an investigation into iExtend Holdings, along with its subsidiary iExi, because of concerns that it was operating a financial services business without holding the requisite Australian financial services licence (AFSL). In essence, ASIC’s concern was that iExtend was dealing in financial products by issuing co-ownership deeds and providing general financial product advice to policyholders.

iExtend was cooperative with ASIC and admitted to the conduct identified. With this admission, ASIC agreed to issue undertakings as an alternative to commencing court proceedings against iExtend. 

Court-enforceable undertakings are a regulatory tool used by authorities to ensure compliance with laws and regulations without resorting to formal legal proceedings, providing an opportunity for parties to rectify issues voluntarily while still being held accountable for their actions.

The undertakings issued by ASIC gave a number of conditions that needed acceptance, which required that iExtend: 

  • Apply for an AFS licence to:
    • issue financial products in respect of the co-ownership deed;
    • varying and disposing of life products, including investment life insurance and life risk insurance;
    • provide general advice; and
    • provide claims handling and settling services.
  • Not enter into any co-ownership deeds until the AFS license is granted.
  • Become and remain a voluntary member of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority 
  • Engage a law firm to review and report on their:
    • dispute resolution process;
    • promotional material accessible to policyholders;
    • template co-ownership deeds to be executed by policyholders;
    • policies and procedures for identifying and dealing with vulnerable persons; and
    • policies and procedures for identifying suitable financial advisers to introduce the product to clients.
  • Submit the law firms’ report to ASIC for implementation of further recommended actions identified within the report.
  • Send a copy of the enforceable undertaking to all policyholders and financial advisers who have engaged with the company.
  • In a prominent place on their website, publish a notice that they are unable to onboard new policyholders, with a link to the enforceable undertaking.

The approach taken by ASIC illustrates the importance of holding or operating under an appropriate ASFL. 

ASIC’s Deputy Chair, Sarah Court, emphasised the importance of financial services businesses being sufficiently licensed to ensure compliance with legal obligations regarding disclosure, design, and distribution of financial products.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

Joe De Ruvo

View Profile →

Helene Chryssidis

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
June 27, 2024 Massive Fines Loom for Supermarkets as Food and Grocery Code of Conduct Set to Become Mandatory
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
June 19, 2024 When Reputation Assists in Protecting Your Brand
Intellectual Property (IP) Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
June 19, 2024 The Implications of Bankruptcy: Barry Decision Provides Insights into Corporate and SMSF Affairs
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
June 19, 2024 Revisiting Legal and Ethical Standards: Lessons From Henderson for Financial Advisers
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
June 18, 2024 Federal Court of Australia Provides Guidance on the Requirements for Licensees to Take Reasonable Steps
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
June 04, 2024 The Importance of an Appropriate AFSL
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
April 18, 2024 2025 Edition of Best Lawyers: Celebrating Our Leaders and a Rising Star
Firm News Corporate & Commercial Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety + 6
March 08, 2024 In Pursuit of Justice: The Women’s Rights Journey
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
October 30, 2023 DW Fox Tucker Lawyers Gains an Engineering Edge with the Arrival of Rising Star
Firm News Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
September 26, 2023 DW Fox Tucker Lawyers Welcomes Helene Chryssidis as Director
Firm News Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
September 22, 2023 Navigating the Building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2009 (SA)
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
July 12, 2023 How to Freeze Crypto Assets in South Australia
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
June 30, 2021 Two of a Kind: Federal Court Refuses to See Double in Case of Identical Pharmaceutical Products
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
June 30, 2021 When are Directors Liable for Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Passing off, Trade Mark Infringement or Unconscionable Conduct?
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Intellectual Property (IP)
June 30, 2021 Jurisdiction Clauses: A Primer
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
June 30, 2021 An Insurer’s Duty of Utmost Good Faith
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Insurance & Risk Management
December 16, 2020 King Reigns All: High Court Decides Holding Companies May Be Held Accountable for Subsidiary Company Actions
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
December 16, 2020 Building and Construction Contracts: The Importance of Good Contract Administration
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Property
December 16, 2020 Debt Recovery and Maximising Costs Recoveries
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
December 16, 2020 A Win for Women in Pelvic Mesh Class Action - for the Moment …
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency