The ACCC’s crackdown on unfair contract terms may impact you if you’re involved in the wine or agribusiness industries.

The newly established ACCC Agricultural Unit has fired at its first target by initiating proceedings against the Mitolo Group Pty Ltd (Mitolo), which is the largest potato wholesaler in Australia.

The ACCC is seeking court declarations that certain standard form supply contracts terms Mitolo has entered into with its potato farmers contain unfair contract terms and are in breach of the mandatory Horticulture Code which came into full effect to protect growers on 1 April 2018 under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

You can read the ACCC release outlining the types of terms the ACCC seeks to establish as being void in more detail at https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/action-against-mitolo-for-alleged-unfair-contract-terms.

The ACCC highlighted Mitolo’s pricing terms. It also alleges that Mitolo’s restraint clause which prevents farmers from selling their farm unless the prospective purchaser first enters into an exclusive potato farming agreement with Mitolo is an unfair contract term.

This form of restraint is common in many wine and agri-business supply contracts. Its intention is to protect the party acquiring produce if there is a change of owner to ensure the continuation of supply. The ACCC has indicated that these are considered to be “egregious” terms and unfair contracting practices in the agri-business sector which it wishes to address on a larger scale and phase out. Unfair contractual terms may be declared void by a Court and also breach relevant industry codes.

Grower contracts with processors are exempt from the Horticulture Code so contracts for the supply of grapes to a winemaker will be exempt, but may still contain unfair contract terms. If a winemaker is a signatory to the Wine Industry Code, then it will be bound by its provisions and must abide by the minimum requirements for wine grape purchase agreements in any case.

In 2016 changes were made to the Australian Consumer Law to extend the law to protect business to business dealings from unfair contractual terms. These protections are afforded to  contracts between businesses if one of them employs fewer than 20 people and the up-front price payable does not exceed $300,000 (or up to $1 million for contracts running for more than a year).

One of the conditions which must be satisfied for a contract term to be considered unfair is that it must “not be reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interest of the party advantaged by the term”. It may be that in many cases, particularly an agreement for the supply of wine grapes, that a restraint clause on the sale of the grower’s property could be considered reasonably necessary to ensure the continuation of supply.

The ACCC action in relation to the Mitolo contracts is likely to have broad application to those within the wine and agribusiness. We urge you to review your current supply contracts and contact us if you have any queries.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

Sandy Donaldson

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
June 19, 2024 When Are Goods or Services Acquired by a “Consumer”? When Do Guarantees Under the Australian Consumer Law Apply? Can Suppliers and Manufacturers Liability Be Limited?
Corporate & Commercial
April 18, 2024 2025 Edition of Best Lawyers: Celebrating Our Leaders and a Rising Star
Firm News Corporate & Commercial Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety + 6
December 20, 2023 New Reasons to Keep Your Contract Terms Fair
Corporate & Commercial
December 20, 2023 Deeds vs Agreements
Corporate & Commercial
December 20, 2023 When Can You Send Unsolicited Electronic Messages?
Corporate & Commercial
September 11, 2023 Advertising Health Services
Corporate & Commercial Health & Aged Care
October 14, 2022 Lessons From Theranos
Corporate & Commercial
October 12, 2022 Vendor Safety Nets
Corporate & Commercial
October 06, 2022 Bind Games
Corporate & Commercial
May 02, 2022 Privacy Week - Top Tips
Corporate & Commercial Intellectual Property (IP)
March 30, 2022 Domain Names and Cyber Security
Corporate & Commercial Intellectual Property (IP)
March 29, 2022 Are You a Director Who Still Needs to Get Your Director ID?
Corporate & Commercial
March 25, 2022 SA Labor to Apply Criminal Law to Workplaces Under its Industrial Relations Policy
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Agribusiness Defence + 7
March 04, 2022 Why We Should Avoid the Use of the Word “Mandate” When Communicating Vaccination Requirements to Workers and the Wider Community
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Health & Aged Care Agribusiness + 3
January 14, 2022 Learning to Live With COVID-19 - The Trolley Dilemma in Our Economy
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Workers Compensation & Self Insurance Agribusiness + 3
September 20, 2021 Termination of the Naval Group’s Australian Contract: What It Means for Local Subcontractors
Corporate & Commercial Defence
June 30, 2021 When are Directors Liable for Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Passing off, Trade Mark Infringement or Unconscionable Conduct?
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Intellectual Property (IP)
January 20, 2021 Terms and Conditions for Sale of Goods/Incoterms® 2020 and Vienna Convention
Corporate & Commercial
December 16, 2020 King Reigns All: High Court Decides Holding Companies May Be Held Accountable for Subsidiary Company Actions
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
December 16, 2020 Building and Construction Contracts: The Importance of Good Contract Administration
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Property